State v. Smith

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Eric Smith, Appellant. __________ Appeal From York County John C. Hayes III, Circuit Court Judge __________ Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-452 Submitted May 1, 2012 Filed July 18, 2012 __________ APPEAL DISMISSED __________ Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant. J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Eric Smith appeals his probation revocation, arguing the circuit court erred in revoking probation because no evidentiary showing of fact established the probation violations. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.1 APPEAL DISMISSED. FEW, C.J., and HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur. 1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.