State v. Phillips

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Jerry Phillips, Appellant. __________ Appeal From Cherokee County J. Mark Hayes, II, Circuit Court Judge __________ Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-447 Submitted June 1, 2012 Filed July 18, 2012 __________ APPEAL DISMISSED __________ Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, and Jerry Phillips, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Barry J. Barnette, of Spartanburg, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Jerry Phillips appeals his conviction of unlawful conduct toward a child, arguing the circuit court erred in giving him a sentence that differed from his co-defendant's sentence. Phillips also asserts several pro se arguments. After a thorough review of the record and all briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss1 the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved. APPEAL DISMISSED. FEW, C.J., and HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur. 1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.