State v. Bright

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Roy G. Bright, Appellant. __________ Appeal From Spartanburg County J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge __________ Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-426 Submitted June 1, 2012 Filed July 18, 2012 __________ APPEAL DISMISSED __________ Appellate Defender Kathrine Columbia, for Appellant. H. Hudgins, of Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Barry J. Barnette, of Spartanburg, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Roy G. Bright appeals his conviction of assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature, arguing the circuit court erred in failing to hold an in camera hearing to determine if a photographic line-up should be suppressed. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.1 APPEAL DISMISSED. FEW, C.J., and HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur. 1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.