State v. Hippenstiel

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Carolyn Ann Hippenstiel, Appellant. __________ Appeal From Colleton County Perry M. Buckner, Circuit Court Judge __________ Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-347 Submitted May 1, 2012 Filed June 6, 2012 __________ APPEAL DISMISSED __________ Appellate Defender Kathrine Columbia, for Appellant. H. Hudgins, of Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Isaac McDuffie Stone, III, of Beaufort, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Carolyn Ann Hippenstiel appeals her convictions of possession of a stolen vehicle and failure to stop for a blue light, arguing the circuit court erred in accepting her guilty plea for possession of a stolen vehicle because no evidence indicated Hippenstiel received the vehicle from someone who stole the vehicle. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.1 APPEAL DISMISSED. PIEPER, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur. 1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.