State v. Flowers

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Carmichael Trevon Flowers, Appellant.

Appeal From Florence County
Ralph King Anderson, Jr., Special Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2011-UP-404
Submitted August 15, 2011 Filed August 25, 2011 

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar L. Clements, III, of Florence, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Carmichael Trevon Flowers appeals his convictions for malicious injury to real property, malicious injury to personal property, and criminal domestic violence, arguing the trial court erred in allowing his trial counsel to continue to represent him after he indicated a desire to waive his right to counsel and proceed pro se.  Additionally, Flowers asserts numerous pro se arguments.  After a thorough review of the record and all briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

HUFF, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.