State v. Culpepper
Annotate this CaseTHIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Jimmy Culpepper, Jr., Appellant.
Appeal From York County
Kenneth G. Goode, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-428
Submitted October 1, 2010 Filed October
11, 2010
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Assistant Chief Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Jimmy Culpepper, Jr. appeals his community supervision revocation, arguing the revocation hearing was so summary that his revocation should be reversed. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., HUFF and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.