State v. Atkinson

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Linda Michelle Atkinson, Appellant.

Appeal From York County
 G. Edward Welmaker, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-180
Submitted March 3, 2008 Filed March 17, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Attorney for Capital Appeals Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

John Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Linda Michelle Atkinson appeals her probation revocation, arguing the trial court erred in revoking thirty months of her probation because there was insufficient evidence to support a finding she violated the terms of her probation.  Atkinson's counsel attached a petition to be relieved, stating he reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit.  Atkinson did not file a pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Atkinson's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, KITTREDGE, and WILLIAMS JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.