State v. Winfrey

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In the Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jesse Winfrey, Appellant.

Appeal from Beaufort County

J. Cordell Maddox, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-147

Submitted March 3, 2008 Filed March 6, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Teresa A. Knox, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Jesse Winfrey appeals the revocation of his probation.  Winfrey contends the plea court erred in revoking his probation because his parole agent was not an attorney but presented the State's case.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Winfrey's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, SHORT, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.