State v. Shannon

Annotate this Case

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS 
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Daniel Allen Shannon, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County
 James C. Williams, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2005-UP-645
Submitted December 1, 2005 Filed December 21, 2005   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Acting Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III,  of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General, Salley W. Elliot, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, for Respondent. 

PER CURIAM:  Daniel Allen Shannon appeals his guilty plea and sentence of twenty years for first degree burglary and petite larceny.  Shannon argues his plea was conditional and thus invalid. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Shannon's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J. and HUFF and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.