State v. Rosenbaum
Annotate this CaseDefendant pled nolo contendere to uttering or delivering checks in an amount exceeding $1500 with intent to defraud, misappropriating property, and obtaining goods valued at more than $500 by false pretenses with intent to cheat or defraud. Defendant was ordered to pay $95,000 in restitution, in monthly installments of $500. Defendant later moved to reduce her monthly installments, claiming that she was only able to pay $237 per month and that, therefore, her payments should be reduced. The superior court denied Defendant’s request, concluding that Defendant had failed to establish that she was financially unable to make the restitution payments. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that Defendant failed to meet her burden of proving an inability to maintain payments of $500 per month.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.