West v. McDonald
Annotate this CasePetitioner Michael West sought to develop six two-family homes on land in a residential neighborhood. After gaining initial support for his proposal by the local zoning officer, the full zoning commission denied Petitioner’s plan. The Board’s decision was later affirmed by the Board of Appeals and the Superior Court. Because Petitioner thought he was in compliance with the zoning ordinances, he challenged the Superior Court’s interpretation of the zoning ordinance to the Supreme Court. Furthermore, Petitioner asked the Court to resolve what he perceived as a conflict between the zoning ordinance and the municipality’s comprehensive plan. The Supreme Court found no error with the lower court’s interpretation of the local zoning ordinance, nor did it find a conflict with the local zoning ordinances and the municipality’s comprehensive plan. The Court affirmed the lower court’s decision.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.