Hernandez, L. v. Quinn, B. (concurring and dissenting statement)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

J-A10038-18 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 LEO HERNANDEZ Appellant v. BRIAN E. QUINN, ESQUIRE, THE LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN E. QUINN, AND BRIAN E. QUINN ESQUIRE, PC : : : : : : : : : : : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 2017 EDA 2017 Appeal from the Order Entered May 17, 2017 In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Civil Division at No(s): 161001514 BEFORE: GANTMAN, P.J., McLAUGHLIN, J., and RANSOM*, J. CONCURRING/DISSENTING STATEMENT BY McLAUGHLIN, J.:FILED JUNE 27, 2018 I join the Majority decision insofar as it affirms the order sustaining Appellees’ Preliminary Objections. I must respectfully dissent, however, to the extent the Majority reverses. I would hold that the trial court properly sustained the preliminary objections to the claims for invasion of privacy and for intentional infliction of emotional distress. ____________________________________ * Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.