J.H. v. Y.H. (concurring and dissenting memorandum)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

J-A14017-14 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION J.H. SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. Y.H. Appellant No. 67 MDA 2014 Appeal from the Order December 20, 2013 In the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County Criminal Division at No(s): 2012-CV 8725 CU BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., OLSON, and STRASSBURGER,* JJ. CONCURRING AND DISSENTING MEMORANDUM BY STRASSBURGER, J: FILED JULY 29, 2014 affirmance of the portions of the contempt order which prohibit Mother from time with Child to be supervised. Those precautions are reasonably ance of with Child to four hours per week. With the other precautions put in place with the contempt order, this time limitation appears to be wholly punitive. ____________________________________________ * Retired Senior Judge specially assigned to the Superior Court. J-A14017-14 should not be used to reward or punish a parent for good Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 504 A.2d 350, 353 (Pa. December 20, 2013 order which limits Mother to four hours of visitation per week, and would remand for the entry of a new supervised visitation schedule that is practical for all involved parties. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.