Com. v. Pennington, J. (concurring)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

J-S79013-14 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. JACK D. PENNINGTON Appellant No. 3012 EDA 2013 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence October 11, 2013 In the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County Criminal Division at No(s): CP-46-CR-0006758-2012 BEFORE: ALLEN, OLSON and STRASSBURGER*, JJ. CONCURRING STATEMENT BY OLSON, J. FILED DECEMBER 18, 2014 In light of this Court’s decisions in Commonwealth v. Newman, 99 A.3d 86 (Pa. Super. 2014) (en banc), Commonwealth v. Valentine, ___ A.3d ___, 2014 WL 4942256 (Pa. Super., Oct. 3, 2014), Commonwealth v. Fennell, ___ A.3d ___, 2104 WL 6505791 (Pa. Super., Nov. 21, 2014), and Commonwealth v. Cardwell, ___ A.3d ___, 2014 WL 6656644 (Pa. Super., Nov. 25, 2014), I am constrained to concur with the learned majority’s decision to vacate and remand for resentencing. However, for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion issued by The Honorable Sallie Updyke Mundy in Newman, and the concurring opinion issued by The Honorable Mary Jane Bowes in Commonwealth v. Bizzel, ___ A.3d ___, 2014 WL 6756277, *4-*11 (Pa. Super., Dec. 2, 2014), I note my disagreement with the issue of severability. *Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court. J-S79013-14 Judge Strassburger joins the Concurring Statement. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.