Marlin, H. v. Lax, P. (judgment order)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

J-A15043-14 HARRIET MARLIN IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant v. PETER LAX Appellee No. 2796 eda 2013 Appeal from the Order Entered April 25, 2013 In the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County Civil Division at No(s): 2013-01605 BEFORE: PANELLA, J., LAZARUS, J., and JENKINS, J. JUDGMENT ORDER BY JENKINS, J.: FILED MAY 12, 2014 pro se from the Order of the Initiate a Predatory Lending Lawsuit. We dismiss the appeal for the following reasons. The Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure set forth mandatory briefing requirements for litigants. conform to the briefing See Pa.R.A.P. 2101 et seq. requirements. Pa.R.A.P. 2101; We may see also Commonwealth v. Adams, 882 A.2d 496, 497-98 (Pa.Super.2005) (Superior Court may quash or dismiss appeals where parties filed nonconforming briefs). J-A15043-14 Appellant filed a one-page brief that ignores the Rules of Appellate Procedure governing the content of briefs and fails to develop meaningful arguments. Although this court may construe pro se briefs liberally, pro se status confers no special benefit upon Appellant. Commonwealth v. Lyons of the Rules of Appellate Procedure precludes meaningful judicial review, we are constrained to dismiss the appeal. Appeal dismissed. Judgment Entered. Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary Date: 5/12/2014 -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.