Ives, A. v. Ives, K. (dissenting)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

J. A25045/13 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 ARTHUR L. IVES v. KATHRYN E. IVES, Appellant : : : : : : : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 134 WDA 2013 Appeal from the Order, December 4, 2012, in the Court of Common Pleas of Warren County Civil Division at No. 355 of 2010 BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., ALLEN AND COLVILLE,* JJ. DISSENTING STATEMENT BY FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E.: FILED DECEMBER 30, 2013 The majority concludes the appellate review sought by Wife is not required as no relief could result therefrom based on its decision at No. 1929 WDA 2012 that dismissed Husband s appeal. Because I believe Husband s appeal should not have been dismissed, I must dissent. * Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.