Commonwealth v. Brooks

Annotate this Case

242 Pa. Superior Ct. 7 (1976)

363 A.2d 1132

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. William BROOKS, Jr., Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

September 27, 1976.

John J. Dean, Anthony J. Lalama, Pittsburgh, for appellant.

John J. Hickton, Dist. Atty., Robert L. Eberhardt, Charles W. Johns, Asst. Dist. Attys., Pittsburgh, for appellee.

Before WATKINS, President Judge, and JACOBS, HOFFMAN, CERCONE, PRICE, VAN der VOORT and SPAETH, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

The evidence was sufficient for the trial judge to deny appellant's demurrer, Commonwealth v. Henderson, 451 *8 Pa. 452, 304 A.2d 154 (1973), and to find appellant guilty of robbery, theft, and simple assault. Commonwealth v. Herman, 227 Pa.Super. 326, 323 A.2d 228 (1974). The convictions are therefore affirmed. However, the judgments of sentence are vacated and the case is remanded for resentencing consistent with the doctrine of merger. Commonwealth v. Nelson, 452 Pa. 275, 305 A.2d 369 (1973).

So ordered.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.