C.L. Scheib v. J. Friedman (per curiam order)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Carole L. Scheib, Petitioner v. Judith Friedman, Respondent PER CURIAM : : : : : : : No. 336 M.D. 2022 ORDER NOW, December 15, 2023, upon review of Carole L. Scheib’s (Petitioner) “Timely-Motion for Reconsideration” and request for Permission to File (collectively, Applications), the Applications are DEEMED DENIED. See 42 Pa. C.S. §5505 (“Except as otherwise provided or prescribed by law, a court upon notice to the parties may modify or rescind any order within 30 days after its entry, notwithstanding the prior termination of any term of court, if no appeal from such order has been taken or allowed.”); cf. Ness v. York Twp. Bd. of Comm’rs, 123 A.3d 1166 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2015) (a trial court’s jurisdiction generally extends for 30 days after entry of the final order; once 30 days has passed, the court is divested of jurisdiction to act).1 This Court’s docket reflects that Petitioner filed a “Timely-Motion for Allowance of Appeal” from our November 2, 2023, Order sustaining Respondent’s preliminary objections and dismissing her Petition for Review. The Supreme Court administratively closed her appeal. See Scheib v. Friedman (Pa., No. 432 MT 2023, filed December 4, 2023). 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.