Twp. of Neshannock v. Kirila Contractors, Inc., et al. (order)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Township of Neshannock, Appellant v. Kirila Contractors, Inc. and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, and Kirila Contractors, Inc., Hatch, Mott MacDonald and Hatch Mott MacDonald, LLC, and Hatch Mott MacDonald T&T, Inc., both t/d/b/a Hatch Mott MacDonald Township of Neshannock v. Kirila Contractors, Inc. and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Appellants : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : CASES CONSOLIDATED No. 387 C.D. 2017 No. 436 C.D. 2017 ORDER NOW, April 23, 2018, having considered designated appellant’s application for reargument and designated appellee Kirila Contractors, Inc.’s answer in response thereto, the application is denied. MARY HANNAH LEAVITT, President Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.