St. Mary Star of the Sea Catholic Church, Astoria v. Dept. of Rev.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT REGULAR DIVISION Property Tax ST. MARY STAR OF THE SEA CATHOLIC CHURCH, ASTORIA, a parish of the Roman Catholic Church, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TC 5248 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR COSTS AND DISBURSEMENTS This matter is before the court on the request of Plaintiff St. Mary Star of the Sea Catholic Church, Astoria, for costs and disbursements. Plaintiff filed its Statement of Attorney Fees and Costs on or about February 2, 2017. 1 The court denied Plaintiff’s request for attorney fees by order on December 28, 2017. That order did not address Plaintiff’s request for costs and disbursements. Plaintiff’s “Description of Costs” included with its Statement of Attorney Fees and Costs lists various items totaling $3,396.37. (Ptf’s Stmt of Atty Fees and Costs, Ex 1 at 31-32.) Defendant’s objection filed on or about February 16, 2017, did not discuss any items in Plaintiff’s Description of Costs. /// 1 Plaintiff generally referred to “costs” when describing the expenses for which it sought reimbursement. (See Ptf’s Stmt of Atty Fees and Costs; Memo in Support.) Based on the type of expenses for which Plaintiff seeks reimbursement, the court concludes that, for purposes of Plaintiff’s request pursuant to ORS 305.490, “costs” encompasses “costs and disbursements” as defined in TCR 68 A(2). Cf. Or Laws 1981, ch 898 § 7 (repealing definition of “costs” as a separate statutorily defined sum and adding “costs and disbursements” as a defined term in ORCP 68). ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR COSTS AND DISBURSEMENTS TC 5248 Page 1 of 3 The court’s rules define costs and disbursements as the “reasonable and necessary expenses incurred in the prosecution or defense of an action other than for legal services.” Tax Court Rule (TCR) 68 A(2). Pursuant to ORS 305.490(2) and TCR 68 B, the court allows costs and disbursements to the prevailing party unless otherwise provided by statute or rule, or unless the court, in its discretion, denies the request in whole or in part. 2 See Wihtol I v. Dept. of Rev., 21 OTR 260, 266 (2013); TCR 68 C(2)(f)(ii). It cannot be disputed that Plaintiff is the prevailing party in this case. Plaintiff prevailed on its sole claim, securing a judgment of exemption from property taxation for the rectory at issue. St. Mary Star of the Sea v. Dept. of Rev., 22 OTR 312, 325 (2016). Accordingly, the court is authorized to award costs and disbursements to Plaintiff. The question remains whether the items listed in the “Description of Costs” are “reasonable and necessary expenses” within the meaning of TCR 68 A(2). Plaintiff did not provide briefing on why any of the listed items were reasonable and necessary. The nature and purpose of some items appear self-evident, such as the entries for two “complaint fees” in the amount corresponding to the court’s filing fees in each division. (Ptf’s Stmt of Atty Fees and Costs, Ex 1 at 31.) Although the court has some question as to the appropriateness of some of the remaining amounts Plaintiff listed, the court is not inclined to sua sponte evaluate the reasonableness or necessity of each item in the absence of any objection from Defendant. One item, however, in the amount of $535.50, is described as “Court reporterdepositions.” (Id.) Pursuant to TCR 68 A(2), “The expense of taking depositions will not be allowed, even though the depositions are used at trial, except as otherwise provided by rule or 2 The court’s references to the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) are to 2013. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR COSTS AND DISBURSEMENTS TC 5248 Page 2 of 3 statute.” Plaintiff has not identified any rule or statute that would allow the award of expenses incurred for the taking of a deposition in this case. Now, therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request for costs and disbursements is granted in the amount of $2,860.87 ($3,396.37 - $535.50). 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff will provide a form of judgment for the award of costs and disbursements in accordance with this order. Dated this ___ day of January, 2018. THIS DOCUMENT WAS SIGNED BY JUDGE ROBERT T. MANICKE ON JANUARY 9, 2018, AND FILED THE SAME DAY. THIS IS A PUBLISHED DOCUMENT. 3 Although Plaintiff requested costs and disbursements in the amount of $3,396.37, it appears to the court that the total amount of costs and disbursements listed in Plaintiff’s Description of Costs is $3,396.38. The court nonetheless awards Plaintiff costs and disbursements on the basis of the amount requested, $3,396.37. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR COSTS AND DISBURSEMENTS TC 5248 Page 3 of 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
