Multnomah County Assessor v. Chen
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT REGULAR DIVISION Property Tax MULTNOMAH COUNTY ASSESSOR, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL CHEN, Defendant. ) ) ) TC 5174 ) ) ) ) ) ) OPINION This matter is before the court after a trial held, with the agreement of both parties, by telephone on December 10, 2013. In this case, Plaintiff is Multnomah County Assessor (the county). The issue is the real market value of the subject property identified as account R103905, owned by Defendant Michael Chen (taxpayer) as of the assessment date of January 1, 2011. Taxpayer purchased the subject property on December 30, 2011, in a foreclosure sale. Taxpayer relies heavily on that sale as an indicator of value for the property as of one year earlier. Taxpayer also points to sale information on one neighboring residence house, also sold in a foreclosure proceeding. Taxpayer introduced little evidence, primarily due to his failure to comply with the evidence exchange requirements of Tax Court Rule (TCR) 56 and his failure to survive evidentiary objections. The county, as the appellant, bears the burden of proof. ORS 305.427. The county provided the court with an appraisal report of a qualified appraiser and the testimony of that OPINION TC 5174 Page 1 of 2 person. The appraiser made an analysis of the impact in the market place of the foreclosure process, concluding that a significant market conditions adjustment is needed to make foreclosure sales evidence reliable in determining real market value. The court finds this evidence credible and persuasive and sufficient to satisfy the burden of proof borne by the county. The court finds that the real market value of the subject property as of January 1, 2011, was as is now shown on the assessor s value on the roll. Counsel for the county is directed to submit an appropriate form of judgment. Now, therefore, IT IS THE OPINION OF THIS COURT that the real market value of the subject property as of January 1, 2011, was as is now shown on the assessor s value on the roll. Dated this ___ day of January, 2014. Henry C. Breithaupt Judge THIS DOCUMENT WAS SIGNED BY JUDGE HENRY C. BREITHAUPT ON JANUARY 28, 2014, AND FILED THE SAME DAY. THIS IS A PUBLISHED DOCUMENT. OPINION TC 5174 Page 2 of 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
