Tate v. Clatsop County Assessor

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Property Tax GINA M. TATE, Plaintiff, v. CLATSOP COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TC-MD 180276G FINAL DECISION1 This case is ready for decision on the agreement of the parties. Plaintiff appealed the 2016–17 and 2017–18 tax roll real market values of property identified as Account 17329, and Defendant moved for summary dismissal. By order issued August 29, 2018, and incorporated herein by reference, the court dismissed Plaintiff’s claim respecting the 2017–18 tax year. Defendant subsequently submitted copies of correspondence showing the parties’ agreement to reduce the subject’s 2016–17 real market value from $448,056 to $337,441, indicating a 25-percent error on the tax roll. Because the subject is a single-family dwelling, the conditions for ordering a correction of the tax roll under ORS 305.288(1) are met. Now, therefore, /// /// /// /// /// /// This Final Decision incorporates without change the court’s Decision, entered September 11, 2018. The court did not receive a statement of costs and disbursements within 14 days after its Decision was entered. See Tax Court Rule–Magistrate Division (TCR–MD) 16 C(1). 1 FINAL DECISION TC-MD 180276G 1 IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that the 2016–17 tax roll should reflect a real market value of $337,441 for the property identified as Account 17329. Dated this day of October, 2018. POUL F. LUNDGREN MAGISTRATE If you want to appeal this Final Decision, file a complaint in the Regular Division of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 State Street, Salem, OR. Your complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of the Final Decision or this Final Decision cannot be changed. TCR-MD 19 B. This document was signed by Magistrate Poul F. Lundgren and entered on October 1, 2018. FINAL DECISION TC-MD 180276G 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.