Vollmayer v. Multnomah County Assessor

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Property Tax KAREN FUFKIN VOLLMAYER, Plaintiff, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TC-MD 160215R FINAL DECISION OF DISMISSAL1 This matter came before the court on Defendant’s Motion for Dismiss the case (Motion), filed October 24, 2016. Defendant’s Motion requests that Plaintiff’s appeal be dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the court’s Order Compelling Site Inspection (Order), issued September 26, 2016. The September 26, 2016, Order stated “within three weeks of the date of this Order, Plaintiff must allow a site inspection of the subject property.” Defendant asserts that Plaintiff has not contacted Defendant to arrange a site inspection. Plaintiff has not responded to Defendant’s Motion. As a result, the court concludes Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss should be granted and Plaintiff’s appeal should be dismissed. The trial scheduled for December 5, 2016 is cancelled. Now, therefore, /// /// /// /// 1 This Final Decision of Dismissal incorporates without change the court’s Decision of Dismissal, entered November 9, 2016. The court did not receive a statement of costs and disbursements within 14 days after its Decision of Dismissal was entered. See Tax Court Rule–Magistrate Division (TCR–MD) 16 C(1). FINAL DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 160215R 1 IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed. Dated this day of November 2016. RICHARD DAVIS MAGISTRATE If you want to appeal this Final Decision of Dismissal, file a complaint in the Regular Division of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 State Street, Salem, OR. Your complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of the Final Decision of Dismissal or this Final Decision of Dismissal cannot be changed. TCR-MD 19 B. This document was filed and entered on November 29, 2016. FINAL DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 160215R 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.