Schlosser v. Department of Revenue

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Income Tax JOSEPH SCHLOSSER and CORRENNA SCHLOSSER, Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TC-MD 120060C DECISION OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on Defendant s motion to dismiss on the ground that Plaintiffs failed to appeal within the 90 days required by ORS 305.280(2). A review of Plaintiffs materials shows the Notice of Deficiency Assessment was mailed to Plaintiffs on November 16, 2011. Plaintiffs filed their Complaint on February 17, 2012 (postmarked February 16, 2012). This interval is two days longer than the 90 days required by ORS 305.280(2),1 which was February 14, 2012. ORS 305.280(2) provides in relevant part: An appeal under ORS 323.416 or 323.623 or from any notice of assessment or refund denial issued by the Department of Revenue with respect to a tax imposed under ORS chapter 118, 308, 308A, 310, 314, 316, 317, 318, 321 or this chapter, or collected pursuant to ORS 305.620, shall be filed within 90 days after the date of the notice. (Emphasis added). The court is not aware of any circumstances that extend the statutory limit of 90 days. Defendant s motion to dismiss is granted. Now, therefore, /// /// 1 All references to the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) are to 2009. DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 120060C 1 IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that Defendant s motion to dismiss is granted. The Complaint is dismissed. Dated this day of April 2012. DAN ROBINSON MAGISTRATE If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in the Regular Division of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 State Street, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of the Decision or this Decision becomes final and cannot be changed. This document was signed by Magistrate Dan Robinson on April 23, 2012. The Court filed and entered this document on April 23, 2012. DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 120060C 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.