Saechao v. Multnomah County Assessor

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Property Tax LOU FOU SAECHAO and SO SENG SAECHAO, Plaintiffs, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TC-MD 050896D DECISION OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on Defendant s Motion to Dismiss, filed November 4, 2005, requesting that the Complaint be dismissed. A case management conference was held Wednesday, November 30, 2005. So Seng Saechao appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs. Bob Alcantara (Alcantara), Appraiser, appeared on behalf of Defendant. During the conference, Alcantara stated that Plaintiffs filed a petition with the board of property tax appeals (BOPTA) for the 2005-06 tax year on November 4, 2005. Plaintiffs will present their evidence in support of a reduction in the real market value of their property to BOPTA. At the conclusion of the BOPTA process, Plaintiffs will receive an order explaining the decision of the BOPTA panel. If Plaintiffs wish to appeal the BOPTA Order, they can file a complaint in this court. /// /// /// /// /// DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 050896D 1 At this time, Plaintiffs appeal to this court is premature. There is no justiciable issue before the court. Now, therefore, IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that this matter be dismissed. Dated this ______ day of December 2005. ____________________________________ JILL A. TANNER PRESIDING MAGISTRATE If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in the Regular Division of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 State Street, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of the Decision or this Decision becomes final and cannot be changed. This document was signed by Presiding Magistrate Jill A. Tanner on December 23, 2005. The Court filed and entered this document on December 23, 2005. DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 050896D 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.