Supanchick v. Lane Co.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Small Claims Property Tax THOMAS E. SUPANCHICK and DEBRA A. SUPANCHICK, Plaintiffs, v. LANE COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TC-MD 030771B CORRECTED DECISION AND JUDGMENT OF STIPULATION This Corrected Decision and Judgment of Stipulation is being issued to include tax year 2000-2001 which was previously omitted from the Judgment of Stipulation filed August 28, 2003. Now, therefore, IT IS ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the real market values of the property described as Account 1267218 were, as stipulated for the following tax years: 2000-2001 2001-02 Land: $ 24,380 Land: $ 24,380 Improvements: $ 114,430 Improvements: $ 117,860 Total: $ 138,810 Total: New Construction: $ $ 142,240 0 IT IS FURTHER ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the county shall correct the assessment and tax rolls to reflect the above values. Any refund due following this correction shall be promptly paid with statutory interest. Dated this ____ day of October, 2003. ________________________________ JEFF MATTSON MAGISTRATE CORRECTED DECISION AND JUDGMENT OF STIPULATION TC-MD 030771B 1 THIS DOCUMENT WAS SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JEFF MATTSON ON OCTOBER 8, 2003. THE COURT FILED THIS DOCUMENT ON OCTOBER 8, 2003. CORRECTED DECISION AND JUDGMENT OF STIPULATION TC-MD 030771B 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.