Ford v. Multnomah Co.

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Property Tax RICHARD C. FORD, Plaintiff, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TC-MD 021088B DECISION OF STIPULATION This matter is before the court upon the written stipulation of the parties filed January 31, 2003. Because the parties are in agreement, the case is ready for decision. Now, therefore, IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that the values of the property described as Account R325210 were, as stipulated for the following tax years: Tax year 1997-98 Land: Improvements: Total RMV: $ 137,100 $ 0 $ 137,100 Exceptions RMV: Assessed Value: $ 0 $ 102,490 Tax year 1998-99 Land: Improvements: Total RMV: $ 137,100 $ 0 $ 137,100 Exceptions RMV: Assessed Value: $ 0 $ 105,560 /// /// /// DECISION OF STIPULATION TC-MD 021088B 1 /// Tax year 1999-2000 Land: Improvements: Total RMV: $ 148,100 $ 0 $ 148,100 Exceptions RMV: Assessed Value: $ 0 $ 108,720 Tax year 2000-2001 Land: Improvements: Total RMV: $ 152,500 $ 0 $ 152,500 Exceptions RMV: Assessed Value: $ 0 $ 111,980 Tax year 2001-02 Land: Improvements: Total RMV: $ 158,600 $ 0 $ 158,600 Exceptions RMV: Assessed Value: $ 0 $ 115,330 Tax year 2002-03 Land: Improvements: Total RMV: $ 165,000 $ 0 $ 165,000 Exceptions RMV: Assessed Value: $ 165,000 $ 116,220 IT IS FURTHER DECIDED that Defendant shall correct the assessment and tax /// /// /// /// DECISION OF STIPULATION TC-MD 021088B 2 /// /// rolls to reflect the above values. Any refund due following this correction shall be promptly paid with statutory interest. Dated this ____ day of March, 2003. ____________________________ JEFF MATTSON MAGISTRATE IF YOU WANT TO APPEAL THIS DECISION, FILE A COMPLAINT IN THE REGULAR DIVISION OF THE OREGON TAX COURT, FOURTH FLOOR, 1241 STATE ST., SALEM, OR 97301-2563. YOUR COMPLAINT MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN 60 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THE DECISION OR THIS DECISION BECOMES FINAL AND CANNOT BE CHANGED. THIS DOCUMENT WAS SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JEFF MATTSON ON MARCH 11, 2003. THE COURT FILED THIS DOCUMENT ON MARCH 11, 2003. DECISION OF STIPULATION TC-MD 021088B 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.