Krom v. Multnomah Co.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Property Tax HOLLY JEAN KROM and DAVID WILLIAM KROM, Plaintiffs, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TC-MD 021044C DECISION Pursuant to the court s Order filed April 17, 2003, Plaintiffs appeal is dismissed for failure to appear or respond to the court s Order. As indicated in that Order, the appeal involves a farm use disqualification based on Defendant s determination that Plaintiffs did not meet the income requirements of the statute. The court held several proceedings and Plaintiffs submitted information pertaining to the income earned. The evidence did not demonstrate compliance with the statute. Defendant so informed the court in a status report filed February 11, 2003, which Plaintiffs were ordered to respond to following their failure to appear for the April 17, 2003, hearing. Plaintiffs were given until May 9, 2003, to notify the court in writing that they wished for the case to proceed or it would be dismissed. As of May 22, 2003, Plaintiffs had not responded to the court s Order. Now, therefore, IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that Plaintiffs appeal is dismissed. Dated this _____ day of May, 2003. _________________________________ DAN ROBINSON MAGISTRATE IF YOU WANT TO APPEAL THIS DECISION, FILE A COMPLAINT IN THE REGULAR DIVISION OF THE OREGON TAX COURT, FOURTH FLOOR, 1241 STATE ST., SALEM, OR 97301-2563. YOUR COMPLAINT MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN 60 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THE DECISION OR THIS DECISION BECOMES FINAL AND CANNOT BE CHANGED. THIS DOCUMENT WAS SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE DAN ROBINSON ON MAY 29, DECISION TC-MD 021044C 1 2003. THE COURT FILED THIS DOCUMENT ON MAY 29, 2003. DECISION TC-MD 021044C 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
