Weldon v. Clackamas Co.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Small Claims Property Tax VERL WELDON, Plaintiff, v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TC-MD 000619E (Control); 000620E; 000621E DECISION AND JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss this case for want of prosecution. A case management conference was scheduled on February 26, 2003, to consider Plaintiff s appeal. On January 27, 2003, notice of the case management conference was sent to Plaintiff at 421 Warner Street, Oregon City, Oregon 97045, which was the address Plaintiff provided to the court. The notice was not returned as undeliverable. Plaintiff did not appear at the case management conference and there was no explanation for Plaintiff s failure to appear. On February 27, 2003, the court sent Plaintiff an Order, which explained the importance of diligently pursuing an appeal. The Order advised that if Plaintiff did not provide a written explanation by March 13, 2003, for his failure to appear, the court would dismiss the appeal. As of this date, Plaintiff has not contacted the court. Under such circumstances, the court finds the appeal must be dismissed for want of prosecution. Now, therefore, IT IS ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Complaint is dismissed. Dated this ____ day of March, 2003. ______________________________ DECISION AND JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 000619E (Control) 1 COYREEN R. WEIDNER MAGISTRATE THIS DOCUMENT WAS SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE COYREEN R. WEIDNER ON MARCH 27, 2003. THE COURT FILED THIS DOCUMENT ON MARCH 27, 2003. DECISION AND JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 000619E (Control) 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
