Heli Tech Inc. v. Lane Co.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Property Tax DAVID WEIL, GINNY WEIL and HELI TECH INC., Plaintiffs, v. LANE COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 020927D DECISION OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on Defendant s motion to dismiss, filed June 26, 2002, requesting that the Complaint be dismissed. A case management conference was held in the above-entitled matter on Wednesday, August 28, 2002. Mr. David Weil, President, appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs. Ms. Gloria Rogers appeared on behalf of Defendant. During the conference, the parties discussed the fact that Plaintiffs property tax payments for tax year 2001-2002 were postmarked November 16, 2001. Ms. Rogers stated that the county accepts the "postmark cancellation date", not metered date, as the "receipt date." The court reviewed the law with Plaintiffs and explained that based on the information presented Defendant's motion to dismiss is granted. Now, therefore, IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that this matter be dismissed. Dated this ______ day of September, 2002. _________________________________ JILL A. TANNER PRESIDING MAGISTRATE IF YOU WANT TO APPEAL THIS DECISION, FILE A COMPLAINT IN THE REGULAR DIVISION OF THE OREGON TAX COURT, FOURTH FLOOR, 1241 STATE ST., SALEM, OR 97301-2563. YOUR COMPLAINT MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN 60 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THE DECISION OR THIS DECISION BECOMES FINAL AND CANNOT BE CHANGED. THIS DOCUMENT WAS SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JILL A. TANNER ON SEPTEMBER 10, 2002. THE COURT FILED THIS DOCUMENT ON SEPTEMBER 10, 2002. DECISION OF DISMISSAL CASE NO. 020927D 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.