Woolcott v. Lane Co.

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Property Tax CHRISTINE J. WOOLCOTT, Plaintiff, v. LANE COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 020685E DECISION OF STIPULATION This matter is before the court upon the oral stipulation of the parties made prior to the commencement of trial on December 4, 2002. The parties agreed that 41.48 acres of the property identified by Map Number 2004130000200 (Tax Lot 200) qualified for special assessment as forestland for the 2001-02 tax year. The parties further agreed that 32.08 acres of the property in Tax Lot 200 qualified for special assessment as farmland for the 2001-02 tax year. Because the parties are in agreement, the case is ready for decision. Now, therefore, IT IS THE DECISION OF THE COURT that, for the 2001-02 tax year, 41.48 acres of the property identified by Map Number 2004130000200 (Tax Lot 200) qualified for special assessment as forestland; IT IS FURTHER DECIDED that, for the 2001-02 tax year, 32.08 acres of the property in Tax Lot 200 qualified for special assessment as farmland; and IT IS FURTHER DECIDED that Defendant shall correct the assessment and tax rolls to reflect the above special assessment. Any refund due following this correction /// /// /// shall be promptly paid with statutory interest pursuant to ORS 311.806 and DECISION OF STIPULATION CASE NO. 020685E 1 ORS 311.812. Dated this ____ day of December, 2002. ________________________________ COYREEN R. WEIDNER MAGISTRATE IF YOU WANT TO APPEAL THIS DECISION, FILE A COMPLAINT IN THE REGULAR DIVISION OF THE OREGON TAX COURT, FOURTH FLOOR, 1241 STATE ST., SALEM, OR 97301-2563. YOUR COMPLAINT MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN 60 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THE DECISION OR THIS DECISION BECOMES FINAL AND CANNOT BE CHANGED. THIS DOCUMENT WAS SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE COYREEN R. WEIDNER ON DECEMBER 12, 2002. THE COURT FILED THIS DOCUMENT ON DECEMBER 12, 2002. DECISION OF STIPULATION CASE NO. 020685E 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.