Stafek v. Lane Co.

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Property Tax TERRY L. STAFEK, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. LANE COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. No. 020614A DECISION OF STIPULATION This matter is before the court upon the oral stipulation of the parties made at a case management conference held at 9:00 a.m. August 12, 2002. Because the parties are in agreement, the case is ready for decision. The court's authority for this act lies in ORS 305.288(3).1 Plaintiff's office manager of 31 years died on December 11, 2001. While this was Plaintiff's property, the property was assessed in her name during the years at issue, a fact which did not come to light until after her death. Together these circumstances constitute the required good and sufficient cause. Now, therefore, IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that the real market value of the property described as Account No. 4115539 was, as stipulated for the 1999-2000, 2000-2001, and 2001-02 tax years: Land: $--- Improvements: $5,000 Total: $5,000 /// /// IT IS FURTHER DECIDED that the county shall correct the assessment and tax 1 All references to the Oregon Revised Statutes are to 2001. DECISION OF STIPULATION CASE NO. 020614A 1 rolls to reflect the above values. Any refund due following this correction shall be promptly paid with statutory interest pursuant to ORS 311.806 and ORS 311.812. Dated this ____ day of August, 2002. ____________________________ SCOT A. SIDERAS MAGISTRATE IF YOU WANT TO APPEAL THIS DECISION, FILE A COMPLAINT IN THE REGULAR DIVISION OF THE OREGON TAX COURT, FOURTH FLOOR, 1241 STATE ST., SALEM, OR 97301-2563. YOUR COMPLAINT MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN 60 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THE DECISION OR THIS DECISION BECOMES FINAL AND CANNOT BE CHANGED. THIS DOCUMENT WAS SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE SCOT A. SIDERAS ON AUGUST 28, 2002. THE COURT FILED THIS DOCUMENT ON AUGUST 28, 2002. DECISION OF STIPULATION CASE NO. 020614A 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.