Shepherd of the Valley v. Washington Co.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE MAGISTRATE DIVISION OF THE OREGON TAX COURT Property Tax SHEPHERD OF THE VALLEY LUTHERAN CHURCH, Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 991484D DECISION OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss. On March 2, 2000, the court put this case into abeyance pending the outcome of settlement discussions or until further order of the court. The parties were to submit trial dates by September 1, 2000, if a settlement appeared unlikely. On September 6, 2000, the court mailed the parties a letter requesting plaintiff submit a written status report or a request to withdraw the case. The court specifically requested that plaintiff provide this information. The court went on to warn that failing to provide the information by September 20, 2000, would result in dismissal. Ample opportunity has been given to supply the information. No response has been made. Therefore, the court concludes that the appeal should be dismissed. Now, therefore; /// /// /// DECISION OF DISMISSAL 1 IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that the Complaint in the aboveentitled matter be dismissed. Dated this _____ day of September, 2000. _________________________________ JILL A. TANNER MAGISTRATE IF YOU BELIEVE YOU HAVE A GOOD REASON EXPLAINING WHY THIS DECISION SHOULD BE SET ASIDE, YOU MAY PROVIDE THE REQUESTED INFORMATION AND REQUEST THAT YOUR APPEAL BE REINSTATED. YOUR REQUEST MUST GIVE A GOOD REASON FOR YOUR FAILURE TO PROVIDE THE INFORMATION EARLIER. THIS DOCUMENT WAS SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JILL A. TANNER ON SEPTEMBER 28, 2000. THE COURT FILED THIS DOCUMENT ON SEPTEMBER 28, 2000. DECISION OF DISMISSAL 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
