Costco v. Washington Co.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE MAGISTRATE DIVISION OF THE OREGON TAX COURT Property Tax COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. No. 990439D DECISION OF STIPULATION This matter is before the court upon the written stipulation of the parties filed on March 16, 2000. IT IS THE DECISION OF THE COURT that the real market value for the 1998-99 tax year shall be revised as followsAccount No. 1S1 36CD-02200 R284392 RMV Land: Improvements: Total: $2,317,940 $7,362,040 $9,679,980 Account No. 2S1 1BA -00200 R458089 RMV Land: Improvements: Total: $361,050 $387,480 $748,530 Account No. 2S1 1BB -01201 R458329 RMV Land: Total: $296,250 $296,250 IT IS FURTHER DECIDED that the county shall correct the assessment and tax rolls to reflect the above values. Any refund due following this correction is to be DECISION OF STIPULATION 1 promptly paid with statutory interest pursuant to ORS 311.806 and 311.812. Dated this _____ day of March, 2000. _________________________________ JILL A. TANNER MAGISTRATE IF YOU WANT TO APPEAL THIS DECISION, FILE A COMPLAINT IN THE REGULAR DIVISION OF THE OREGON TAX COURT, FOURTH FLOOR, 1241 STATE ST., SALEM, OR 97310. YOUR COMPLAINT MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN 60 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THE DECISION OR THIS DECISION BECOMES FINAL AND CANNOT BE CHANGED. THIS DOCUMENT WAS SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JILL A. TANNER ON MARCH 28, 2000. THE COURT FILED THIS DOCUMENT ON MARCH 28, 2000. DECISION OF STIPULATION 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.