Village v. Clackamas Co.

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE MAGISTRATE DIVISION OF THE OREGON TAX COURT Property Tax VILLAGE AT MAIN STREET, PHASE I, LLC, VILLAGE AT MAIN STREET, PHASE II, LLC, and VILLAGE AT MAIN STREET PHASE III, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. ___________________________________ VILLAGE AT MAIN STREET, PHASE I, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 990125B (Control) No. 990729B AMENDED DECISION OF STIPULATION This matter is before the court upon the written amended stipulation of the parties filed on September 20, 2000. IT IS THE DECISION OF THE COURT that the real market values of property described as the following Account Nos. were, as stipulated for the 1997-98 and 1998-99 tax years; Account No. 01772193 Account No. 01772200 Land: $3,274,670 Land: Improvements: $ Improvements: Total: 1997-98 $3,274,670 0 Total: $1,527,600 $1,527,600 /// DECISION OF STIPULATION 1 1998-99 Land: $ 3,634,880 Land: $1,603,980 Improvements: $ 6,750,000 Improvements: $5,750,000 Total: $10,384,880 Total: $7,353,980 IT IS FURTHER DECIDED that the county shall correct the assessment and tax rolls to reflect the above values. Any refund due following this correction is to be promptly paid with statutory interest pursuant to ORS 311.806 and 311.812. Dated this ____ day of October, 2000. ____________________________ JEFF MATTSON MAGISTRATE IF YOU WANT TO APPEAL THIS DECISION, FILE A COMPLAINT IN THE REGULAR DIVISION OF THE OREGON TAX COURT, FOURTH FLOOR, 1241 STATE ST., SALEM, OR 97310. YOUR COMPLAINT MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN 60 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THE DECISION OR THIS DECISION BECOMES FINAL AND CANNOT BE CHANGED. THIS DOCUMENT WAS SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JEFF MATTSON ON OCTOBER 12, 2000. THE COURT FILED THIS DOCUMENT ON OCTOBER 12, 2000. DECISION OF STIPULATION 2 *Amended as to the value for tax year 1997-98 Account Nos. 01772193 and 01772200. DECISION OF STIPULATION 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.