Cox v. DOR
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE MAGISTRATE DIVISION OF THE OREGON TAX COURT Small Claims Income Tax STEVEN DALE COX and ANDREA LOUISE WARE, Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, STATE OF OREGON, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 001020F DECISION AND JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL Plaintiffs filed an appeal as to a Notice of Refund Adjustment for the 1999 tax year. A case management conference was scheduled on October 18, 2000, at 9:00 a.m. to consider their appeal. Notice of the case management conference was sent to plaintiffs at their last known address. It was not returned as undeliverable. Plaintiffs did not appear at the case management conference. There was no explanation for their failure to appear. On October 18, 2000, the court sent Mr. Cox and Ms. Ware a letter. It was not returned as undeliverable. This letter explained the importance of diligently pursuing an appeal. It warned that dismissal would be the consequence of continued inaction. /// /// There has been no subsequent contact with the court. Under such DECISION AND JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 1 circumstances the appeal must be dismissed for want of prosecution. Now, therefore, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Complaint is dismissed. Dated this ____ day of November, 2000. ______________________________ SALLY L. KIMSEY MAGISTRATE THIS DOCUMENT WAS SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE SALLY L. KIMSEY ON NOVEMBER 17, 2000. THE COURT FILED THIS DOCUMENT ON NOVEMBER 17, 2000. DECISION AND JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
