Martin v. Multnomah Co.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE MAGISTRATE DIVISION OF THE OREGON TAX COURT Property Tax MICHAEL T. MARTIN, dba Industrial Upholstery, Plaintiff, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 000747D DECISION OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss plaintiff's Complaint for failure to pay the statutory filing fee. The court received from plaintiff an appeal without the correct fee for filing a standard case. The court sent plaintiff a letter on May 18, 2000, requesting that the additional fee be paid. The letter advised plaintiff that if the fee was not paid, the court would dismiss the case. The court has yet to receive the additional filing fee. Now, therefore; IT IS THE DECISION OF THE COURT that the Complaint in the aboveentitled matter be dismissed. Dated this ____ day of June, 2000. _________________________________ JILL A. TANNER MAGISTRATE IF YOU BELIEVE YOU HAVE A GOOD REASON WHY THIS DECISION SHOULD BE SET ASIDE, YOU MUST PAY THE $25 FILING FEE AND REQUEST THAT YOUR APPEAL BE REINSTATED. YOUR REQUEST MUST GIVE A GOOD REASON FOR YOUR FAILURE TO PAY THE FEE EARLIER AND MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THE DECISION OR THIS DECISION BECOMES FINAL AND CANNOT BE DECISION OF DISMISSAL 1 CHANGED. THIS DOCUMENT WAS SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JILL A. TANNER ON JUNE 13, 2000. THE COURT FILED THIS DOCUMENT ON JUNE 13, 2000. DECISION OF DISMISSAL 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
