Bergquist v. Jackson Co.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE MAGISTRATE DIVISION OF THE OREGON TAX COURT Property Tax DONNA BERGQUIST, Plaintiff, v. JACKSON COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 000338C DECISION OF STIPULATION This matter is before the court upon the agreement of the parties, as set out in defendant s May 24, 2000, appraisal report, to which plaintiff expressed agreement in writing on May 25, 2000, following the May 25 case management conference.1 IT IS THE DECISION OF THE COURT that the real market value (RMV), exceptions RMV, and maximum assessed value (MAV) of property described as Account No. 1-011019-7 was, as stipulated for the 1999-00 tax year: RMV Land: $ 193,050 RMV Improvements: $ 1,045,890 RMV Total: $ 1,238,940 Exception RMV: $ 401,520 MAV Total: $ 875,090 /// IT IS FURTHER DECIDED that the county shall correct the assessment and 1 Mr. Bergquist appeared on behalf of his wife at the May 25 case management conference. Mr. Bergquist was not designated as plaintiff s representative and his name was not on the Complaint. Accordingly, Mrs. Bergquist s written assent to defendant s recommendation was necessary. That agreement came via facsimile later that day. DECISION OF STIPULATION 1 tax rolls to reflect the above values. The assessed value shall be adjusted accordingly. Any refund due following this correction is to be promptly paid with statutory interest pursuant to ORS 311.806 and 311.812. Dated this ____ day of May, 2000. ____________________________ DAN ROBINSON MAGISTRATE IF YOU WANT TO APPEAL THIS DECISION, FILE A COMPLAINT IN THE REGULAR DIVISION OF THE OREGON TAX COURT, FOURTH FLOOR, 1241 STATE ST., SALEM, OR 97310. YOUR COMPLAINT MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN 60 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THE DECISION OR THIS DECISION BECOMES FINAL AND CANNOT BE CHANGED. THIS DOCUMENT WAS SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE DAN ROBINSON ON MAY 31, 2000. THE COURT FILED THIS DOCUMENT ON JUNE 1, 2000. DECISION OF STIPULATION 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
