Broschart v. Multnomah Co.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE MAGISTRATE DIVISION OF THE OREGON TAX COURT Property Tax LAWRENCE L. BROSCHART, dba Consolidated Electronics, Plaintiff, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 000310D DECISION OF DISMISSAL Plaintiff filed a Complaint. This Complaint did not include the notice he was appealing from and the additional fee for filing a standard case. The court specifically requested that plaintiff provide this information. The court went on to warn that failing to provide the information would result in dismissal. Ample opportunity has been given to supply the information. No response has been made. Therefore, the court concludes that the appeal should be dismissed. Now, therefore; IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that the Complaint in the aboveentitled matter be dismissed. Dated this _____ day of June, 2000. _________________________________ JILL A. TANNER MAGISTRATE IF YOU BELIEVE YOU HAVE A GOOD REASON EXPLAINING WHY THIS DECISION SHOULD BE SET ASIDE, YOU MAY PROVIDE THE REQUESTED INFORMATION AND REQUEST THAT YOUR APPEAL BE REINSTATED. YOUR REQUEST MUST GIVE A GOOD REASON FOR YOUR FAILURE TO PROVIDE THE INFORMATION EARLIER. THIS DOCUMENT WAS SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JILL A. TANNER ON JUNE 9, 2000. DECISION OF DISMISSAL 1 THE COURT FILED THIS DOCUMENT ON JUNE 9, 2000. DECISION OF DISMISSAL 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.