Robinson v. DOR
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE MAGISTRATE DIVISION OF THE OREGON TAX COURT Income Tax DONALD J. ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, STATE OF OREGON, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 000294C DECISION OF DISMISSAL Plaintiff filed an appeal as to a personal income tax assessment for the 1995 tax year. A case management conference was scheduled for September 7, 2000, to consider his appeal. Notice of the case management conference was sent to plaintiff at his last known address. It was not returned as undeliverable. Plaintiff did not appear at the case management conference. There was no explanation for this failure to appear. On September 11, 2000, the court sent plaintiff an Order to Show Cause. It was not returned as undeliverable. This Order explained to plaintiff he must submit an explanation as to why he was unavailable and the lack of an amended 1099. It warned that dismissal would be the consequence of continued inaction. /// /// /// /// There has been no subsequent contact with the court. Under such DECISION OF DISMISSAL 1 circumstances the appeal must be dismissed for want of prosecution. Now, therefore; IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that the Complaint is dismissed. Dated this ____ day of October, 2000. ______________________________ DAN ROBINSON MAGISTRATE IF YOU WANT TO APPEAL THIS DECISION, FILE A COMPLAINT IN THE REGULAR DIVISION OF THE OREGON TAX COURT, FOURTH FLOOR, 1241 STATE ST., SALEM, OR 97310. YOUR COMPLAINT MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN 60 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THE DECISION OR THIS DECISION BECOMES FINAL AND CANNOT BE CHANGED. THIS DOCUMENT WAS SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE DAN ROBINSON ON OCTOBER 10, 2000. THE COURT FILED THIS DOCUMENT ON OCTOBER 10, 2000. DECISION OF DISMISSAL 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
