State v. Soto
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
No. 158 March 9, 2022 233 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ORRIN KAWIKI KEALOHI SOTO, Defendant-Appellant. Tillamook County Circuit Court 19CR82985; A174571 Mari Garric Trevino, Judge. Submitted February 11, 2022. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Nora Coon, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Michael A. Casper, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before James, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and Kamins, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. 234 State v. Soto PER CURIAM Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for third-degree sexual abuse, acknowledging that we have previously held that lack of consent in third-degree sexual abuse was a circumstance element that required only a mental state of criminal negligence. State v. Wier, 260 Or App 341, 353, 317 P3d 330 (2013). But, defendant argues, under the Oregon Supreme Court’s recent decision in State v. Haltom, 366 Or 791, 824, 472 P3d 246 (2020), that interpretation of the statute is no longer viable. We adhere to our decision in Weir, but we note that the issue is currently before the Oregon Supreme Court in State v. Carlisle (S067880), and resolution of that case will likely affect this one. Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
