Halladay v. Board of Parole
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
136 August 19, 2020 No. 404 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON JEFFREY D. HALLADAY, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision A172740 Submitted July 2, 2020. Jeffrey D. Halladay filed the briefs pro se. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jeff J. Payne, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge. PER CURIAM OAR 255-060-0006(1) and OAR 255-060-0012(1) held valid. Cite as 306 Or App 136 (2020) 137 PER CURIAM Pursuant to ORS 183.400, petitioner challenges the validity of two rules of the Board of Parole and PostPrison Supervision, OAR 255-060-0006(1) and OAR 255060-0012(1). Petitioner argues that OAR 255-060-0006(1) exceeds the statutory authority of the board under ORS 144.280(1)(a) and (b), and that OAR 255-060-0012(1) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and ex post facto prohibitions under the state and federal constitutions. We have considered those challenges and reject them without additional published discussion. OAR 255-060-0006(1) and OAR 255-060-0012(1) held valid.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
