Sharp v. Board of Parole

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

556 June 27, 2018 No. 305 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON JEFFREY G. SHARP, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision A166071 Submitted May 4, 2018. Jeffrey G. Sharp filed the briefs pro se. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Keith L. Kutler, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Hadlock, Presiding Judge, and DeHoog, Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge. PER CURIAM OAR 255-035-0022 held valid. Cite as 292 Or App 556 (2018) 557 PER CURIAM Under ORS 183.400, petitioner challenges OAR 255-035-0022, a rule adopted by the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (the board), asserting that the rule is inconsistent with the board’s statutory authority. See ORS 183.400(4) (court shall declare a rule invalid only if the rule violates constitutional provision, exceeds the statutory authority of the agency that adopted the rule, or was adopted without compliance with applicable rulemaking procedures). Having reviewed the parties’ arguments, we reject petitioner’s contentions and conclude that the challenged rule is valid. OAR 255-035-0022 held valid.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.