Adamson v. BOLI
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
No. 188 April 18, 2018 445 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON Barry ADAMSON, Petitioner, v. BUREAU OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Respondent. Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries A165559 Submitted February 2, 2018. Barry Adamson filed the briefs pro se. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Carson L. Whitehead, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Garrett, Judge, and Powers, Judge. PER CURIAM OAR 839-005-0005, OAR 839-005-0010, OAR 839-0050205, and OAR 839-005-0206 held valid. 446 Adamson v. BOLI PER CURIAM Under ORS 183.400, petitioner seeks a judicial determination of the validity of four administrative rules adopted by the Bureau of Labor and Industries, arguing that OAR 839-005-0005, OAR 839-005-0010, OAR 839-0050205, and OAR 839-005-0206 are unconstitutionally overbroad under the free exercise clauses in Article I, sections 2 and 3, of the Oregon Constitution. Having reviewed petitioner’s arguments, we conclude that the rules challenged by him are valid. OAR 839-005-0005, OAR 839-005-0010, OAR 839005-0205, and OAR 839-005-0206 held valid.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
