State v. S.-Q. K.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
184 September 19, 2018 No. 474 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON In the Matter of S.-Q. K., a Youth. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. S.-Q. K., Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 15JU03217; Petition Number 150522117; A161045 Merri Souther Wyatt, Judge. On appellant’s petition for reconsideration filed July 31, 2018. Opinion filed July 18, 2018. 292 Or App 836, ___ P3d ___. Christa Obold Eshleman for petition. Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and James, Judge. PER CURIAM Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified. Cite as 294 Or App 184 (2018) 185 PER CURIAM Appellant has petitioned for reconsideration of our opinion in State v. S.-Q. K., 292 Or App 836, ___ P3d ___ (2018), requesting that we correct a factual error in the opinion. See ORAP 6.25(1)(a). Appellant asserts that the opinion “erroneously states that youth was adjudicated for riot, ORS 166.015. 292 Or App at 837, et seq.” Although the delinquency petition originally alleged riot, appellant points out that the juvenile court later amended the petition to conform to the evidence and youth was instead adjudicated for conduct that would constitute disorderly conduct in the second degree, ORS 166.025. Appellant requests that we modify our opinion to correct that error. Appellant is correct. Therefore, we allow reconsideration and modify the opinion to reflect that youth was adjudicated for conduct that would constitute disorderly conduct in the second degree, ORS 166.025—not riot, ORS 166.015. Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
