State v. D. A. R.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
No. 616 December 20, 2017 435 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON In the Matter of D. A. R., a Person Alleged to have a Mental Illness. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. D. A. R., Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 16CC05696; A163250 Monica M. Smith-Herranz, Judge pro tempore. Submitted November 14, 2017. Joseph R. DeBin and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Dustin Buehler, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and James, Judge. PER CURIAM Reversed. 436 State v. D. A. R. PER CURIAM Appellant appeals a judgment committing him to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days. See ORS 426.130. In his second assignment of error, he contends that the trial court plainly erred when it failed to advise him of the possible results of the proceeding in accordance with ORS 426.100(1). Specifically, appellant contends that the trial court plainly erred when it did not advise him that those possible results included voluntary treatment or conditional release. Under our recent decisions in State v. M. M., 288 Or App 111, 405 P3d 192 (2017), and State v. M. S. R., 288 Or App 156, 403 P3d 809 (2017), appellant is correct that the trial court plainly erred. Further, for the reasons stated in those cases, we exercise our discretion to correct the error. Our disposition of the second assignment of error obviates the need to address appellant’s remaining assignment of error. Reversed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
