State v. N. M.

Annotate this Case

FILED: December 16, 2009

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

In the Matter of N. M.,
Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.

STATE OF OREGON,

Respondent,

v.

N. M.,

Appellant.

Umatilla County Circuit Court
MC090008
A141644

Christopher R. Brauer, Judge.

Submitted on October 02, 2009.

Kent A. Anderson filed the brief for appellant.

John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Jerome Lidz, Solicitor General, and Pamela J. Walsh, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman, Judge, and Ortega, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Reversed.

PER CURIAM

In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that, among other things, the evidence was insufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, at the time of the hearing, he suffered from a mental disorder that caused him to be a danger to himself or to others.  ORS 426.130(1).  The state concedes that the evidence is not sufficient.  On de novo review, State v. O'Neill, 274 Or 59, 61, 545 P2d 97 (1976), we agree that the evidence is insufficient.

Reversed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.