State v. L. A. T.
Annotate this CaseFILED: April 22, 2009
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
In the Matter of L. A. T.,
Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE OF OREGON,
Respondent,
v.
L. A. T.,
Appellant.
Lane County Circuit Court
300704237
A134948
Maurice K. Merten, Judge.
Submitted on December 05, 2008.
James A. Palmer filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Katherine H. Waldo, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
PER CURIAM
Reversed.
PER CURIAM
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is a danger to others because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state's concession and reverse.
Reversed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.