State v. Braaten
Annotate this CaseFILED: March 11, 2009
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
STATE OF OREGON,
Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
LYLE ALLEN BRAATEN,
Defendant-Appellant.
Marion County Circuit Court
05C52601, 05C54468, 06C41139, 06C49896
A134921 (Control)
A134922, A134923, A134924
Marion County Circuit Court
05C52601
Susan M. Tripp, Judge.
Submitted on October 30, 2008.
Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Joshua B. Crowther, Deputy Public Defender, Legal Services Division, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Doug M. Petrina, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Rosenblum, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Riggs, Senior Judge.
PER CURIAM
Affirmed.
PER CURIAM
Defendant was convicted of three counts of first-degree theft (Counts 1, 2, and 3) and one count of attempted theft. In a separate case, defendant was convicted of second-degree theft. At a consolidated sentencing hearing, the trial court imposed consecutive durational departure sentences on Counts 1, 2, and 3. The court imposed the sentences to be served consecutively to one another and consecutively to the sentence imposed on defendant's separate second-degree theft conviction. Defendant advances an unpreserved challenge to the trial court's authority to order that the sentences be served consecutively in the absence of findings of fact by the jury. In light of Oregon v. Ice, __ US __, 129 S Ct 711, __ L Ed 2d __ (2009), the trial court did not err.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.