State v. Borck

FILED: November 25, 2009

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

STATE OF OREGON,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

RUSSELL PATRICK BORCK,

Defendant-Appellant.

Yamhill County Circuit Court
CR050689
A134423

Carroll J. Tichenor, Judge.

On appellant's petition for reconsideration filed October 06, 2009.  Opinion filed September 09, 2009.  230 Or App 619, 216 P3d 915.

Jason E. Thompson and Ferder Casebeer French & Thompson, LLP, for petition.

Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.

PER CURIAM

Defendant petitions for reconsideration of our opinion affirming his convictions on various crimes.  State v. Borck, 230 Or App 619, 216 P3d 915 (2009).  Although we reject without discussion defendant's substantive contentions in support of his petition, we allow reconsideration for the limited purpose of modifying and correcting one aspect of our quotation of the trial court's operative ruling, as set out at 230 Or App at 629.  Specifically, in the fourth paragraph of our quotation of the trial court's ruling, which begins "[The letters] do show * * *," the two references to "[M]" in that paragraph should, instead, read "[J]."

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.